I don't recall any motion "We will continue with McMillan and Co for our legal representation" being put to the meeting, either to be carded or voted.

The vote that went to the group was "We choose to engage Helen as our lawyer", which failed to pass.

The common understanding (including my understanding) was that we will stay with McMillan, and that may have been also voiced by various people at the meeting, but technically that was not a minute that we agreed.  I don't want to re-open debate on this at all, but we need to be accurate in our minutes.

Thanks,
Alex

On 12/07/19 10:10 am, Maria Callau wrote:

Hi all, 

Minutes - yesterday's meeting attached. 

Please get back to me with any comments and I will issue a final version. 

Thanks, 

Maria Callau
Architectural Graduate / LBP / Energy Consultant

________________________________________

SUR ARCHITECTURE

ASB House, Level 6

248  Cumberland Street,

PO Box 5510, Dunedin 9058

www.sur-architecture.com

_______________________________________________
Ucol-shareholders mailing list
Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz
https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders

_______________________________________________
Ucol-shareholders mailing list
Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz
https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders