Here is the response from our lawyer to the questions I sent. You don't
necessarily need to read it all, but here are some of the key points:
* If all goes well with the build we may be able to settle in early
February, but it depends on everyone's lawyers (and banks if you are
getting a mortgate) to work in with the timing.
* If your solicitor or bank has been asking for the S&P agreement
signed by UCOL, please get them to ask MacMillan directly for this.
* Simon is advising against use of the units before settlement. This
is something we may need to meet with him to discuss.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: RE: Timing of Toiora Cohousing units settlement
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:16:01 +0000
From: Simon Milne <simon(a)mcmillanco.nz>
To: Alex King <alex(a)king.net.nz>
CC: UCOL Directors <ucol-directors(a)list.king.net.nz>
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your email below and plaese see my comments in blue below.
Thanks
Regards
Simon
Simon Milne
PARTNER AND NOTARY PUBLIC
McMillan&Co.
LAWYERS ˑ MEDIATORS ˑ NOTARY PUBLIC
Level 5, Forsyth Barr House, 165 Stuart Street, The Octagon ,
Dunedin
9016;
PO Box 5547, Dunedin 9054
P
*+64 3 477 2238* <tel:+64%203%20477%202238>
|
M
*021 729324* <tel:021%20729324>
|
F
*+64 3 474 5588* <fax:+64%203%20474%205588>
|
*simon(a)mcmillanco.nz* <mailto:simon@mcmillanco.nz>
|
*www.mcmillanco.nz* <http://www.mcmillanco.nz/>
Disclaimer: The information in this email is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
respect this and notify the sender immediately by telephone. Please also
destroy this email. Thank you.
CHRISTMAS HOURS
McMillan&Co. will be closed for the Christmas period from
Midday, Wednesday, 23 December 2020, with normal
office hours resuming Monday, 18 January 2021.
*From:*Alex King <alex(a)king.net.nz>
*Sent:* Monday, 23 November 2020 11:21 AM
*To:* Simon Milne <simon(a)mcmillanco.nz>
*Cc:* UCOL Directors <ucol-directors(a)list.king.net.nz>
*Subject:* Timing of Toiora Cohousing units settlement
Dear Simon,
I am writing to give you an idea of some of our current thinking
regarding the project. I ask a few questions in my text below.
Hopefully they are straightforward, but let us know if they are complex
and a meeting would be a more efficient?
Timing of settlement
Our S&P agreements (clause 23 in further terms) state settlement will
take place on the 10th working day after the later of notice of title
and code of compliance are issued. But this may be varied by agreement.
Contractually, the builders have until late February to complete the
project, but indications from the build are that the work will be
largely finished prior to Christmas.
Should building be successfully completed then and Code of Compliance be
issued without problems, we would like to be in a position to settle
according to the following programme:
* Buildings complete on 24th December.
* Apply for Code of Compliance by 4th January
* Draft a S&P amendment for a Friday, 5th February settlement date on
20th January
* Confirm CoC and title are issued/available on 3rd of February
* Settlement 5th February.
Our project manager assures us that the documentation required for code
compliance is relatively straightforward.
We plan to have a followup meeting with our planner to refresh our
understanding of our resource consent conditions, in case anything
remains that may hold up subdivision approval. (We are meeting onsite
at midday 25th November).
We also plan to check with the surveyor to check progress on the
subdivision.
Assuming a successful build completion by December 24th and Code of
compliance issued by 3rd February, is this a realistic timetable to
enable issue of title and a 5th of February settlement?
Yes this timetable is possibly realistic but it obviously depends upon
timing of a number of different factors as you have noted above.
Therefore at this stage we cannot give any guarantees around the
timeframes you are suggesting. The reason for having a 10 day settlement
timeframe after issue of the CCC and the Titles is to enable purchasers
through their solicitors time to organise themselves for settlement
which will usually also require obtaining loan documents from their bank
etc. Some purchasers may be able to settle earlier than the 10 working
day timeframe others may require all of that time. My suggestion is that
once we are in a position to be able to give the 10 working day notice
of settlement we then invite any purchasers via their solicitors to
settle earlier if they are in a position to do so.
Purchasers' issues raising mortgages
Some of our purchasers' banks have raised the following points when
approached for mortgages:
* Title doesn't exist... we are assuring them it is well underway and
title will be issued before the mortgage is required.
Yes correct – as noted above once Titles issue that will enable
purchasers to then provide their bank with a copy of the new Title and
will enable their bank to issue loan instructions. All banks are aware
of this process when it is a development/subdivision where new titles
are to issue.
* One bank (at least) is concerned about ongoing liability under
shareholders' guarantee of the construction loan. It may be that we
require some kind of release from this agreement at settlement, we
will keep talking to the banks about this.
Yes we would envisage that this guarantee could be released on
settlement which is when the Kiwibank loan will be repaid ( from the
sale proceeds of all 24 Units).
* Purchasers' solicitors have noted they don't have copies of the S&P
agreement signed by the vendor. Could you please arrange for these
to be forwarded (this would be normal practice I expect?)
Please note that most if not all of the purchasers solicitors should
already be holding a signed copy of the Agreement. We have had a request
from one solicitor for a copy of the signed Agreement which we have
provided and if any other purchasers solicitors request a copy we can
easily provide that.
Use of development prior to settlement
The directors and group are keen to allow prospective purchasers to use
their units after building completion but prior to settlement for the
following purposes:
* Storage of household items
* (for some people) renting/living in the units, and particularly if
settlement is delayed beyond 8th February.
We would require a legal agreement, perhaps a standard residential
tenancy agreement, to set out expectations and particularly liability
for damage. We would want the purchaser to agree that any damage
occurring to the property as a result of the tenancy would not be a
reason not to settle, and also if the purchaser fails to settle, they
would be liable to fix any such damage.
We don't need this drafted yet, but would instruct you next year should
it be needed.
We would also communicate with Kiwibank who have an interest in our
property before letting it.
I would not recommend allowing purchasers occupation prior to settlement
being completed as this can be problematic. It can cause issues around
insurance, will likely be an issue for Kiwibank, could be an issue for
contractors who may need access to complete last minute works in order
for the CCC to issue. If any purchaser was desperately requiring to move
in or store items prior to settlement then yes this could be dealt with
by way of a temporary residential tenancy but I would not recommend that
as an option available to purchasers. It would be far cleaner if
settlement ( and possession) is given on the settlement date which is
when settlement funds are received.
Insurance and timing of commencement of Body Corporate
We require insurance from the date of building completion, when the
building insurance lapses. Our broker indicates the insurance company
will cover us from that date under the same policy that the body
corporate will have once we move in.
Yes correct and noted.
Assuming the timeline above, what is the likely date of the deposit of
plan under section 17 of the unit titles act, when the body corporate
will come into existence? Is that likely before or after completion of
the build?
The plan will deposit prior to completion of the build. It will be a
matter of you liaising with the builders and your insurer as to exactly
when your insurance needs to be put into place and the building
insurance lapses.
If the body corporate is not formed before completion of the build, the
company (UCOL) will take up the insurance in the first instance and
transfer it to the body corporate at a later date.
Yes correct and noted.
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours sincerely,
Alex King,
Director, UCOL
Hi all (note that I would have send this to Chat list but I couldn't
make it work)
Excellent day yesterday although daunting as normally it is with
getting rid/store Old things , but again another big tick for all of
us.
We managed to store a lot of things, so good on us!!
I mentioned yesterday while we were storing / dumping stuff that I was
going to share photos of things I will put on trademe just in case
anyone wants it.
1- OLD ( apparently some will be or are discontinued) LIGHTING from
the school & the exit sign
2- HOOKS/COAT HANGERS on a long piece of wood. there are 3-4 of these
but the idea is to remove all hooks and keep them in case we need them
later.
Timber can be claimed for individuals if they are keen to use them.
NOTE: we have already stored and kept 6-8 1m (+/-) long pieces with
hooks for the common area.
3- Also there is some good timer from the old steps that I will try to
keep it in my garage until we move to the cohousing, unless people say
we don't want this.
Contact me this week to arrange or otherwise it goes somewhere else
(e.g trademe ) .
Regards,
Juan Puricelli
Director
cel. +64 (022) 6585021
________________________________________
SUR ARCHITECTURE
www.sur-architecture.com
Notd on recent communication from our lawyers:
*CHRISTMAS HOURS *
McMillan&Co. will be closed for the Christmas period from
*Midday, Wednesday, 23 December 2020*, with normal
office hours resuming *Monday, 18 January 2021*.
Hi everyone,
An important meeting has turned up for me on Thursday evening which means
that I can't make it to our regular meeting,
Can we please delay Toiora Agreement discussions for one week?
TIA
Warren
I've shared an item with you:
Prospective buyers/renters
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1dzKCw1z7WabMLH2StvL_igO8WEPL6gEk?us…
It's not an attachment – it's stored online. To open this item, just click
the link above.
I am putting the responses from people who were at the induction workshop
on 22nd into this folder, for anyone who wants to have a look at them.
Hello everybody.
I need to report to Kiwiabank with an indication of possible new loans that
will come from shareholders in the coming months.
If you are intending to *increase your loan to UCOL before settlement*, can
you please get back to me with an indication of the amount and timeframe.
As you know this will affect how much we'll need to borrow for the
remaining of the project and therefore how much interest we'll need to pay.
The sooner that I receive this information the better so I can get this
underway.
I will also report to Directors.
Many thanks,
Maria
--
*Maria Callau*
*TOIORA* High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
FYI
There's been some discussion in the cohousing email list recently about
whether units in cohousing communities sell at a premium. In USA they
don't.
This response left me feeling so grateful to all our "founding members" and
gave me such a rush of gratitude for the situation we now find ourselves
in as the first owners of Toiora cohousing, that I wanted to share it so
everyone could also get the buzz of happiness that comes with reflecting on
how lucky we have been with our project.
Jan
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Diana Carroll <dianaecarroll(a)gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020, 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: [C-L]_ cohousing premium?
To: Dick Margulis <dick(a)dmargulis.com>
Cc: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l(a)cohousing.org>
Appraisals ARE based on selling price. That's what they are: a prediction
of selling price. And if you DO list it above appraised value, and you DO
get a buyer at the inflated price...they won't be able to get a mortgage,
because mortgages are limited by appraised value.
We've had several owners put their homes up for sale. When deciding how
much to sell it for, they typically either get it professionally appraised
by an appraiser or real estate agent, or do their own informal appraisal by
looking at comparables.
If there is a selling premium (such as if an individual buyer is really set
on cohousing and this is the only cohousing home for sale in the area), it
isn't anywhere *near *$100,000. $10k maybe? But no, I don't really think
there is any appreciable difference in price in our area (Central MA).
If you are talking about initial prices for founding members...well, that's
a wildly different story and has so many variables, there's no way to give
any rule of thumb. It's amazing the price which our founding members
(including me) were willing to pay...maybe 30% above equivalent units. But
that was because we'd all sunk *soooooo *much money into the project (never
mind time, energy, heart, soul and dreams) that we couldn't walk away. The
prices were never aimed to be 30% higher, but construction costs grow as
happens on pretty much every project ever. We weren't helped by the fact
that comparable prices were dropping like crazy because we went "online" in
2008. I paid $525,000 for a unit that was only worth about $300k on the
day I bought it, and now is worth only about $400k. It's not happy-making.
Diana
(Mosaic Commons)
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:40 AM Dick Margulis <dick(a)dmargulis.com> wrote:
> Diana,
>
> Thanks for your response. I'm sorry that I didn't state my question
> clearly.
>
> My question is about the difference in selling price, not the difference
> in appraised value.
>
> In other words, if I see a cohousing unit listed for sale for $600K,
> would a similar-size conventional condo nearby also be listed for $600K,
> or would it likely be, say, $500K?
>
> Dick
>
> On 11/27/2020 11:23 AM, Diana Carroll wrote:
> > No premium. I've worked with zillions of appraisers now and they don't
> care
> > at all. It's all about the square footage and number of bedrooms, and
> maybe
> > a really small premium for having more amenities, but for all the
> > intangible benefits of cohousing? Nada. AND if you add in the fact that
> > most cohousing units are smaller than corresponding conventional
> > units...cohousing is kind of a minus on the appraisal front.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:09 AM Dick Margulis <dick(a)dmargulis.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are looking at a cohousing unit and at a comparable
non-cohousing
> >> condo, what is the average premium for the cohousing unit?
> >>
> >> Has anyone studied this question and come up with a US average?
> >>
> >> Lacking that, if anyone has done this exercise for their own community,
> >> would you please comment?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Dick Margulis
> >> Rocky Corner
> >> Bethany CT
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
http://L.cohousing.org/info
*Working Bee: Saturday 28 November 10am* will be a weeding session with
entry through Montpellier gate.
*Tues 1 December, 6pm* ... you'll have to open the attachment to find out
more about that one :-)
Any errors or omissions please email me and I'll endeavour to get a
corrected version out to everyone on Monday.
Thanks
Jan