Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St). I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal? I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way... We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks, Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
------------------------------ If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited.. ------------------------------
*From:* High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com *Sent:* Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. *To:* Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz *Subject:* Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
*INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES*
*P* 03 477 4000 |*E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz*
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
*www.dunedin.govt.nz http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/*
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
[image: DCC Main Page] https://au-api.mimecast.com/s/click/kBq8iZulqEWNJvkiMBjA-NSCbdp2nL6ir1UrCD5iRYDzViYmowRww4jXnCxSMfJPzcLa6m--YeV4oqfVWCcg6_uaDw0pUDUqpKYSGf1LvLANFIShNvYYpxHfDYKL3aVLnjVV-DolyvK5sL6EdwX2IP-zSsgST4aEfBZ5jaeT5-zTVo0BQIdYwcXLAZaxq8RD2oIMIaJkNVJHa-XN-QWEmQ ------------------------------
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited.. ------------------------------
*From:* High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com *Sent:* Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. *To:* Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz *Subject:* High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
We aren’t worried but seems a bit odd to have 21 etc at the opposite end to 25. If they started with 1 at mornington shops end and went the other way round it would hopefully makes numbers easier to follow. regds
From: Ucol-shareholders ucol-shareholders-bounces@list.king.net.nz On Behalf Of High St Cohousing Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 4:28 pm To: UCOL shareholders ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz Subject: [Ucol-shareholders] Cohousing - Unit Numbers
Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested.
They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St.
This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St).
I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal?
I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way...
We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks,
Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz > Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com >
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
_____
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
_____
From: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com > Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. To: Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz > Subject: Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz > wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES
P 03 477 4000 |E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
www.dunedin.govt.nz http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
_____
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
_____
From: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. To: Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
Hi Maria (and other cohousers), I'm happy to go along with the numbering the DCC wants. Sue T
Sent from my iPhone
On 15/01/2021, at 4:28 PM, High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St). I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal? I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way... We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks, Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
<0.png> If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited.. From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. To: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES P 03 477 4000 |E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
www.dunedin.govt.nz
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
<image001.png>
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. To: Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
--
Maria Callau
Graduate Architect
High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing UCOL Member and Project Coordinator 0211847490
<25 Alva St.pdf> <HSC - NUMBERS.pdf> _______________________________________________ Ucol-shareholders mailing list Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders
Hi Maria, We are fine with the DCC system.
Frances and Sandy
On 15/01/2021, at 4:28 PM, High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St). I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal? I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way... We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks, Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz> Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com>
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited.. From: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. To: Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz> Subject: Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz> wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES
P 03 477 4000 |E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
www.dunedin.govt.nz http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/ P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
<image001.png> https://au-api.mimecast.com/s/click/kBq8iZulqEWNJvkiMBjA-NSCbdp2nL6ir1UrCD5iRYDzViYmowRww4jXnCxSMfJPzcLa6m--YeV4oqfVWCcg6_uaDw0pUDUqpKYSGf1LvLANFIShNvYYpxHfDYKL3aVLnjVV-DolyvK5sL6EdwX2IP-zSsgST4aEfBZ5jaeT5-zTVo0BQIdYwcXLAZaxq8RD2oIMIaJkNVJHa-XN-QWEmQ If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
From: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. To: Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
--
Maria Callau
Graduate Architect
High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing UCOL Member and Project Coordinator 0211847490
<25 Alva St.pdf><HSC - NUMBERS.pdf>_______________________________________________ Ucol-shareholders mailing list Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders
I'm fine with the new numberingMin -------- Original message --------From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Date: 15/01/2021 4:29 pm (GMT+12:00) To: UCOL shareholders ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz Subject: [Ucol-shareholders] Cohousing - Unit Numbers Hi all, The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St).I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC. I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal?I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way...We can discuss this further in due course. Thanks, Maria---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nzDate: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PMSubject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for commentsTo: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Hi Maria, Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards. If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there. So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc. The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street. As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard. (I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors). However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below. If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better. So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard. See the attached scan. Cheers Bruce
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. To: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz wrote:
Hi Maria, I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails… DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan. Can I have you opinion please. Cheers
Bruce Hall INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES P 03 477 4000 |E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054 New Zealand www.dunedin.govt.nz P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. To: Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
In face of other decisions, this seems pretty minor. I’m happy to comply with DCC preferred system. Gay
Gay Buckingham 027 4544012
On 15/01/2021, at 7:47 PM, bluefrog bluefrog@orcon.net.nz wrote:
I'm fine with the new numbering Min
-------- Original message -------- From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Date: 15/01/2021 4:29 pm (GMT+12:00) To: UCOL shareholders ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz Subject: [Ucol-shareholders] Cohousing - Unit Numbers
Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St). I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal? I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way... We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks, Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
<0.png> If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited.. From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. To: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES P 03 477 4000 |E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
www.dunedin.govt.nz
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
<image001.png>
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. To: Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
--
Maria Callau
Graduate Architect
High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing UCOL Member and Project Coordinator 0211847490
Ucol-shareholders mailing list Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders
Happy with the DCC numbering….. Catherine
On 15/01/2021, at 8:01 PM, Gay Buckingham <gaybuckingham@tuatara.net.nz mailto:gaybuckingham@tuatara.net.nz> wrote:
In face of other decisions, this seems pretty minor. I’m happy to comply with DCC preferred system. Gay
Gay Buckingham 027 4544012
On 15/01/2021, at 7:47 PM, bluefrog <bluefrog@orcon.net.nz mailto:bluefrog@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
I'm fine with the new numbering Min
-------- Original message -------- From: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com> Date: 15/01/2021 4:29 pm (GMT+12:00) To: UCOL shareholders <ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz mailto:ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz> Subject: [Ucol-shareholders] Cohousing - Unit Numbers
Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St). I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal? I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way... We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks, Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz> Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com>
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited.. From: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. To: Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz> Subject: Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall <Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz> wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES
P 03 477 4000 |E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
www.dunedin.govt.nz http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/ P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
https://au-api.mimecast.com/s/click/kBq8iZulqEWNJvkiMBjA-NSCbdp2nL6ir1UrCD5iRYDzViYmowRww4jXnCxSMfJPzcLa6m--YeV4oqfVWCcg6_uaDw0pUDUqpKYSGf1LvLANFIShNvYYpxHfDYKL3aVLnjVV-DolyvK5sL6EdwX2IP-zSsgST4aEfBZ5jaeT5-zTVo0BQIdYwcXLAZaxq8RD2oIMIaJkNVJHa-XN-QWEmQ <image001.png> https://au-api.mimecast.com/s/click/kBq8iZulqEWNJvkiMBjA-NSCbdp2nL6ir1UrCD5iRYDzViYmowRww4jXnCxSMfJPzcLa6m--YeV4oqfVWCcg6_uaDw0pUDUqpKYSGf1LvLANFIShNvYYpxHfDYKL3aVLnjVV-DolyvK5sL6EdwX2IP-zSsgST4aEfBZ5jaeT5-zTVo0BQIdYwcXLAZaxq8RD2oIMIaJkNVJHa-XN-QWEmQ
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
From: High St Cohousing <ucolbuild@gmail.com mailto:ucolbuild@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. To: Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz mailto:Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
--
Maria Callau
Graduate Architect
High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing UCOL Member and Project Coordinator 0211847490
Ucol-shareholders mailing list Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz mailto:Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders
Ucol-shareholders mailing list Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz mailto:Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders
Hi Maria,
The numbering change is fine by us.
Rgds,
Anthony & Anna
On 15/01/2021, at 16:29, High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St). I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal? I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way... We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks, Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
<0.png> If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited.. From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. To: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES P 03 477 4000 |E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
www.dunedin.govt.nz
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
<image001.png>
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
From: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. To: Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Subject: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
--
Maria Callau
Graduate Architect
High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
Maria Callau
TOIORA High Street Cohousing UCOL Member and Project Coordinator 0211847490
<25 Alva St.pdf> <HSC - NUMBERS.pdf> _______________________________________________ Ucol-shareholders mailing list Ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz https://list.king.net.nz/listinfo/ucol-shareholders
Hi All,
Thanks all for the positive feedback received. I only received support to go ahead with the DCC numbering proposal (around 1/2 of members responded). No objections so I am instructing DCC to proceed with this.
Thanks,
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:28 PM High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The DCC has come back with a proposal for our unit numbers that is slightly different from what we suggested. They are happy to remove the number 13 but would like a sequence for houses that have direct access from Alva St and High St. This does not affect what we had proposed for Alva St but it does affect the order we had proposed for High St Block.
See attached plan provided by DCC (PDF: 25 Alva St). I am happy with the proposal suggested by DCC.
I have also attached our original proposal approved by the group (PDF: HSC NUMBERS).
Let me know what you think we should do. Should we get back to the DCC saying that we are happy with their proposal? I would like to get back to them asap as this is part of our unit title process.
In addition, we thought that we could have a reference to the units numbers in the pedestrian access (between Alva St Block and High St Block), so visitors can find their way... We can discuss this further in due course.
Thanks, Maria
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:11 PM Subject: RE: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments To: High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com
Hi Maria,
Unfortunately that doesn’t quite fit with the addressing standards we must use. That’s why we tend to use the Unit Number in the first instance, it’s the easiest way to meet the addressing standards.
If I recall correctly the mail boxes are all going to be together at the Alva Street entrance, so there’s no issue there.
So it comes down to a logical numbering sequence so the units are easy to find for visitors, couriers, emergency services etc.
The numbering of the units facing Alva Street works, but not the ones facing High Street.
As I understand it the units coloured red and blue are accessed from the High Street side (i.e. that’s where their front door is) and the yellow units are accessed from the internal courtyard.
(I go down High Street in the bus and see the lovely coloured doors).
However I may be incorrect on this and they may all be accessed from the internal courtyard – which would affect what I have proposed below.
If that is the case then numbering the red and blue units sequentially works better and the yellow units sequentially from the other side would work better.
So 7-16 (missing 13) for the units facing High Street and 17-22 for the upstairs units accessed from the internal courtyard.
See the attached scan.
Cheers
Bruce
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
*From:* High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com *Sent:* Friday, 15 January 2021 11:11 a.m. *To:* Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz *Subject:* Re: FW: High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
Hi Bruce,
The group has developed the attached plan which is different from what you sent...
Is there any option of amending your plan to match our numbers?
As the unit title has not been issued yet, we might still have this option.. let me know what you think.
It would be 1-25/2-25, etc as you plan but in a different order.
Let me know if this is possible...
Maria
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:21 AM Bruce Hall Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz wrote:
Hi Maria,
I not sure where this is at – I seem to be missing some emails…
DCC’s preference is for the units to be numbered using the Unit Number from the Unit Title Plan – see attached Plan.
Can I have you opinion please.
Cheers
Bruce Hall
*INFORMATION SUPPORT BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES*
*P* 03 477 4000 |*E bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz bruce.hall@dcc.govt.nz*
Dunedin City Council, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
*www.dunedin.govt.nz http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/*
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
[image: DCC Main Page]
https://au-api.mimecast.com/s/click/kBq8iZulqEWNJvkiMBjA-NSCbdp2nL6ir1UrCD5iRYDzViYmowRww4jXnCxSMfJPzcLa6m--YeV4oqfVWCcg6_uaDw0pUDUqpKYSGf1LvLANFIShNvYYpxHfDYKL3aVLnjVV-DolyvK5sL6EdwX2IP-zSsgST4aEfBZ5jaeT5-zTVo0BQIdYwcXLAZaxq8RD2oIMIaJkNVJHa-XN-QWEmQ
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify us immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited..
*From:* High St Cohousing ucolbuild@gmail.com *Sent:* Thursday, 12 December 2019 11:29 a.m. *To:* Bruce.Hall@dcc.govt.nz *Subject:* High St Cohousing Units Numbers - Draft Proposal for comments
HI Bruce,
I am part of High St Cohousing.
We are currently in the process of making some decisions for the number of our units.
I understand that my colleague Tim Ross has been in contact with you regarding this.
I have produced a sketch showing some ideas for the numbers.
The groups is happy with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.
Would you be able to comment on our numbering system proposed in the pdf attached?
The development would have a number for Alva st.
e.g.
Unit 1, 25 Alva St.
Unit 2, 25 Alva St.
etc.
All mailboxes will be located together along the the access from Alva st.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Maria
--
*Maria Callau*
*Graduate Architect*
High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
*Maria Callau*
*TOIORA* High Street Cohousing
UCOL Member and Project Coordinator
0211847490
--
*Maria Callau*
*TOIORA* High Street Cohousing UCOL Member and Project Coordinator 0211847490
ucol-shareholders@list.king.net.nz
-
Anthony Doesburg -
bluefrog -
Catherine Spencer -
Frances Ross -
Gay Buckingham -
High St Cohousing -
Roz Wilson -
Susan Taylor